Reading comprehension
is the product of a complex integration of multiple skills. Several studies
have investigated whether individual differences in reading comprehension are
best explained by the processing aspects or by the storage aspects of working
memory tasks. There is substantial evidence that tasks measuring processing in
addition to storage, such as the listening span task, are better indicators of
reading comprehension performance than tasks assessing the temporary storage of
information only, such as the word span task.
Two areas of research
speak to whether these domain general executive functions contribute to
individual variation in reading comprehension. Firstly, largely separate
studies have shown that different executive functions explain variance in
reading comprehension performance. Secondly, in a small number of recent
studies an indirect relation between inhibition and children's reading
comprehension, via working memory tasks, has been reported. In summary, domain-specific working memory,
commonly assessed with a listening span task, has been found to be a significant
predictor of variation in reading comprehension even when word recognition and
language ability are taken into account. The current study included non-verbal
cognitive ability, word recognition and vocabulary as control measures, a
listening span to reflect an integrated construct of working memory, and a
storage measure and separate measures of the executive functions' inhibition
and cognitive flexibility, as well as the higher order executive function planning.
Non-verbal cognitive ability, word-recognition, vocabulary, storage and
executive functions were expected to directly contribute to reading
comprehension. The contribution of storage and executive functions was expected
to decrease after accounting for performance on the listening span task.
Annisa Masnasuri Kesai
16611069
Article

No comments:
Post a Comment