In literature reading and spelling, the
ongoing debate concerns whether reading and spelling share a single lexicon
lyrics or relying on independent lexica. Existing evidence tends to favor a
single lexicon account on top of an independent lexica account, but the
evidence is mixed and open for alternative explanations. In the current work, they propose another largely ignored account - separate-but-shared lexica - which
he says reads and spellings have separate lexica orthography, but information
can be shared between the two. We report three experiments designed to evaluate
competitively these three theoretical accounts. In each trial, participants
learn new words through reading and / or spelling training. Key manipulations
concerning the number of readings versus the spelling of certain items
received. After the training, they assess the timing and accuracy of the response
to the final reading and spelling results. According to the independent lexica
account, the final performance in one modality will not be affected by the
level of practice in other modalities. According to a single lexicon account,
the final performance will depend on the total number of practices regardless
of their modalities. According to a separate-but-together account, the final
performance will be affected by the level of practice in both modalities but
will benefit more from the same equality practice. Results support separate but
shared accounts, indicating that reading and spelling rely on separate lexica,
but information can be shared between the two.
Annisa Masnasuri Kesai
16611069
Article
No comments:
Post a Comment